Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris's avatar

Thank you for mentioning "115" (I think his name started with a d?), it struck me as super odd that Starr never starts referring to him by his name, especially when she reflects on how Kahlil is unfairly dehumanized by being referred to as just a drug dealer. Furthermore, after the shooting, 115 hardly appears in the book at all, making it difficult to justify Starr et all's assessments of his character. It should be such an easy loophole for Thomas to button up, but she leaves herself wide open, frustratingly weakening the moral case of her novel.

Gabe's avatar

Sucking on social media's biased teat made me LOL. I think you are asking important questions, but they're more effective in an in-person realm. So many things online are mis-communicated because tone is missing, or most people don't know how to convey tone, or most people don't have a developed sense of humor or understand sarcasm or irony. So many fights erupt online because of these reasons. I do think it would be interesting to read how Chris' parents meet Starr. There are so many layers to this work, and ways of understanding it. Ultimately, I'm glad it's out there as it provokes a discussion. It's astounding that it's on the Banned Books List as Jill pointed out.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?